- Posts: 2
Martini forcefield parameters for Mg2++ for a glycosylated protein
- zmazhar9
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Fresh Boarder
Less
More
2 years 7 months ago #9105
by zmazhar9
Martini forcefield parameters for Mg2++ for a glycosylated protein was created by zmazhar9
Hello Martini FF developers,
I am currently using Martini 2 for a protein which has a glycan on one of its chains that I am interested in. However, the protein also has a metal ion dependent adhesion site which has a Mg2+ important for the protein's activation and ligand binding activity. I was wondering if there are parameters available for Mg2+ as well as a script to convert it to a CG representation. I have been recommended to use Ca2+ but our lab showed how replacement of Mg2+ with Ca2+ can inhibit the protein's activity. I would appreciate the help!
Best regards,
Zahra
I am currently using Martini 2 for a protein which has a glycan on one of its chains that I am interested in. However, the protein also has a metal ion dependent adhesion site which has a Mg2+ important for the protein's activation and ligand binding activity. I was wondering if there are parameters available for Mg2+ as well as a script to convert it to a CG representation. I have been recommended to use Ca2+ but our lab showed how replacement of Mg2+ with Ca2+ can inhibit the protein's activity. I would appreciate the help!
Best regards,
Zahra
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- riccardo
- Offline
- Platinum Boarder
2 years 4 months ago #9253
by riccardo
Replied by riccardo on topic Martini forcefield parameters for Mg2++ for a glycosylated protein
Not sure that even atomistic force fields can capture differences between Ca2+ and Mg2+, and, definitely, Martini 2 would not.
According to Supp. Table 25 of the Martini 3 paper ( www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01098-3 ), magnesium is described by a TD (with charge +2) bead, while calcium by a SD or TD (both with charge +2) "depending on the application". Hence, you may try to use Martini 3 and check if you see differences between calcium and magnesium by modelling Mg by a TD bead and Ca by a SD bead. Validation against experimental data is however highly recommended.
According to Supp. Table 25 of the Martini 3 paper ( www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01098-3 ), magnesium is described by a TD (with charge +2) bead, while calcium by a SD or TD (both with charge +2) "depending on the application". Hence, you may try to use Martini 3 and check if you see differences between calcium and magnesium by modelling Mg by a TD bead and Ca by a SD bead. Validation against experimental data is however highly recommended.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.097 seconds